By John Kruzel
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal from a Texas inmate convicted of robbery who argues that the 27 years he was forced by prison officials to spend in solitary confinement violated the constitutional bar against “cruel and unusual.”
The justices turned away Dennis Hope’s appeal of a lower court’s ruling that he had failed to show that his prolonged solitary confinement violated the U.S. Constitution Eighth Amendment prohibition on excessive punishment.
Hope, who is still in prison but as of last year no longer in solitary confinement, filed a civil rights lawsuit against prison officials in 2018.
He was convicted in 1990 of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Following a 1994 prison escape, Hope was placed by prison officials in solitary confinement. In court papers, Hope described spending between 22 and 24 hours a day in a cell 9 feet long and 6 feet wide (2.7 meters by 1.8 meters) – “no larger than a parking space.” Hope said he continued to be held in solitary confinement despite being deemed by Texas security officials in 2005 to no longer pose an escape risk.
He was deprived of nearly all human contact aside from interactions with prison staff, and said he suffered bouts of anxiety, depression, hallucinations and thoughts of suicide while being denied treatment, according to his lawsuit.
The Eighth Amendment states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
A federal judge in Texas in 2020 dismissed Hope’s lawsuit, finding that his allegations failed to “rise to the level of a violation of the Eighth Amendment,” and the New Orleans-based U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2021 agreed.
The 5th Circuit decided that “long-term solitary confinement is not per se cruel and unusual,” citing Supreme Court precedent stating that “the length of isolation sentences was not considered in a vacuum.”
Hope filed an appeal to the Supreme Court in 2022, asking the justices to resolve a split among federal appeals courts over whether solitary confinement could constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
About a week after Hope’s filing, Texas officials initiated a process that culminated in June with Hope’s transfer out of solitary confinement into the prison general population. Hope and Texas officials then sought to negotiate a settlement but failed to reach an agreement, prompting the parties in March to ask the Supreme Court to resume consideration of Hope’s appeal.
Texas asked the justices to consider the case moot since Hope is no longer held in solitary confinement, a request that was contested by Hope’s lawyers.
(Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)
